<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Nick Bonadies's Barbarian Blog</title>
    <link>http://www.barbariangroup.com/employees/nick_bonadies.xml</link>
    <description>The latest posts by Nick Bonadies on TheBarbarianGroup.com</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <item>
      <title>Red Ring of Death Rant</title>
      <description>&lt;div class="t_block"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.barbariangroup.com/assets/users/nick/images/0000/5047/2370056464_f0c23ffcf1.jpg" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;


	&lt;div class="t_block"&gt;So I&amp;#8217;ve been hit with the RRoD for a &lt;strong&gt;third&lt;/strong&gt; time, and for a second time right before the holiday game rush when all my favorites are releasing their newest titles.  Each time I&amp;#8217;ve gotten a new/refurb box, and yet &lt;em&gt;it keeps happening&lt;/em&gt;.  Its not even that big a deal to get the box replaced, its that I have to get the box replaced in the first place.  for a third time in three years.&lt;/div&gt;


	&lt;div class="t_block"&gt;If you haven&amp;#8217;t yet, &lt;a href="http://venturebeat.com/2008/09/05/xbox-360-defects-an-inside-history-of-microsofts-video-game-console-woes/" target="_blank"&gt;check out this article about the history of the RRoD.&lt;/a&gt; Its definitely an interesting read, and boggles the mind that Microsoft would piddle away so much money on something that is fixable. Which makes me think that in a year I&amp;#8217;ll probably be buying the Xbox 720, or maybe I will get one of those ps3 things&amp;#8230;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
      <author>Nick Bonadies</author>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 13:34:46 -0400</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.barbariangroup.com/posts/1189-red_ring_of_death_rant</link>
      <guid>http://www.barbariangroup.com/posts/1189-red_ring_of_death_rant</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>FFF: Formal Friday Fail</title>
      <description>&lt;div class="t_block"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.barbariangroup.com/assets/users/nick/images/0000/4977/Photo_38.jpg" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
      <author>Nick Bonadies</author>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 17:25:25 -0400</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.barbariangroup.com/posts/1161-fff_formal_friday_fail</link>
      <guid>http://www.barbariangroup.com/posts/1161-fff_formal_friday_fail</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Opera Study concludes 4.13% of web standards compliant</title>
      <description>&lt;div class="t_block"&gt;&lt;a href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20081015-opera-study-only-4-13-of-the-web-is-standards-compliant.html" target="_blank"&gt;Interesting read over at Ars&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;


	&lt;blockquote&gt;
		&lt;div&gt;Opera also ran the pages indexed by &lt;span class="caps"&gt;MAMA&lt;/span&gt; through the &lt;span class="caps"&gt;W3C&lt;/span&gt;&amp;#8217;s validation tools to see how many conform with standards. The results show that only 4.13 percent are valid. A more startling conclusion that Opera derived from its &lt;span class="caps"&gt;MAMA&lt;/span&gt; data is that only 50 percent of sites that display a badge touting validation are actually valid. This could indicate that many sites which are initially designed with valid &lt;span class="caps"&gt;HTML&lt;/span&gt; later cease to be valid as changes are made and new content is added.&lt;/div&gt;
	&lt;/blockquote&gt;


	&lt;div class="t_block"&gt;And I&amp;#8217;ll just add in here that &lt;a href="http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fbarbariangroup.com&amp;#38;charset=%28detect+automatically%29&amp;#38;doctype=Inline&amp;#38;group=0" target="_blank"&gt;http://barbariangroup.com&lt;/a&gt; does pass validation.  What is interesting is that our &lt;a href="http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.barbariangroup.com%2Fposts&amp;#38;charset=%28detect+automatically%29&amp;#38;doctype=Inline&amp;#38;group=0" target="_blank"&gt;blog page fails validation&lt;/a&gt; due to embed code that we grab from other sites to embed content in blog posts, which totally reflects the findings of that study. Too bad because I know Kenji worked hard on that markup!&lt;/div&gt;</description>
      <author>Nick Bonadies</author>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 13:58:36 -0400</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.barbariangroup.com/posts/1139-opera_study_concludes_4_13_of_web_standards_compliant</link>
      <guid>http://www.barbariangroup.com/posts/1139-opera_study_concludes_4_13_of_web_standards_compliant</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Getting Vlad the Deployer to Play Nice With Ubuntu Server 8.04</title>
      <description>&lt;div class="t_block"&gt;It&amp;#8217;s actually an easy fix!  Vlad is hard coded to look for &amp;#8220;Password:&amp;#8221; as the sudo password prompt in stdout.  Ubuntu server decided to be special and change this default prompt to something else.&lt;/div&gt;


	&lt;div class="t_block"&gt;The fix is to over-ride the Ubuntu server defaults so that it actually prints &amp;#8220;Password:&amp;#8221; to stdout.  To do this, first become root&lt;/div&gt;


	&lt;div class="t_block"&gt;&lt;code&gt;su root&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/div&gt;


	&lt;div class="t_block"&gt;Then edit your sudoers file by running&lt;/div&gt;


	&lt;div class="t_block"&gt;&lt;code&gt;visudo&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/div&gt;


	&lt;div class="t_block"&gt;That&amp;#8217;ll safely open your sudoers file in vi (side note!  if you&amp;#8217;re using a barebones install of Ubuntu server, you may want to install vim instead of straight up vi, but its a preference thing).  When you&amp;#8217;re into your sudoers file, you&amp;#8217;ll wanna look for the Defaults section and add this: passprompt=&amp;#8221;Password:&amp;#8221;  So your sudoers file will end up looking something like:&lt;/div&gt;


	&lt;div class="t_block"&gt;&lt;code&gt;# sudoers file.&lt;/code&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;code&gt;#&lt;/code&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;code&gt;# This file MUST be edited with the 'visudo' command as root.&lt;/code&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;code&gt;#&lt;/code&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;code&gt;# See the sudoers man page for the details on how to write a sudoers file.&lt;/code&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;code&gt;#&lt;/code&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;code&gt;# Defaults specification&lt;/code&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;code&gt;Defaults        env_reset,passprompt="Password:"&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/div&gt;


	&lt;div class="t_block"&gt;&lt;code&gt;# User privilege specification&lt;/code&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;code&gt;root    ALL=(ALL) ALL&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/div&gt;


	&lt;div class="t_block"&gt;After you&amp;#8217;ve done that, write the file and quit using regular vi commands and you&amp;#8217;re done!  Now Vlad will play nice with your Ubuntu server install.&lt;/div&gt;</description>
      <author>Nick Bonadies</author>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 09:53:43 -0400</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.barbariangroup.com/posts/1118-getting_vlad_the_deployer_to_play_nice_with_ubuntu_server_8_04</link>
      <guid>http://www.barbariangroup.com/posts/1118-getting_vlad_the_deployer_to_play_nice_with_ubuntu_server_8_04</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Advertising creates another bomb scare</title>
      <description>&lt;div class="t_block"&gt;this time in philly not boston!&lt;/div&gt;


	&lt;blockquote&gt;
		&lt;div&gt;Hours before the Phillies-Atlanta Braves&amp;#8217; game on Wednesday night, a film crew shot a commercial of the mascot shooting heavily wrapped hot dogs from a launcher.  But someone inadvertently left three of the duct taped hot dogs outside the ballpark, sparking security fears. Stadium employees were evacuated and the bomb squad was called in.&lt;/div&gt;
	&lt;/blockquote&gt;


	&lt;div class="t_block"&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/us/AP-ODD-Hot-Dog-Scare.html?_r=1&amp;#38;oref=slogin" target="_blank"&gt;link&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
      <author>Nick Bonadies</author>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 12:43:40 -0400</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.barbariangroup.com/posts/1055-advertising_creates_another_bomb_scare</link>
      <guid>http://www.barbariangroup.com/posts/1055-advertising_creates_another_bomb_scare</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
