Internet Culture

posted 03/17/08 by Rick Webb

Lolz OMG. Suxxors. Reading the internet can be like reading esperanto.
When we started this company, we viewed the internet as a population, a culture unto itself. We added value for our clients not just through our awesome production, creative and development skillz, but because we understood this internet culture. Because we were part of it. Because we lived it. As the internet usage has expanded in the last 6 years, the mainstream population has moved onto the internet. We’ve got a wider audience. There are “normal” people on this thing now. But that doesn’t mean the internet culture has disappeared. Think on this: the creators of the Lolcat, I Can Has Cheezburger employs nine people and still, to this day, gets millions of page views a month1. Seriously. Think about that. People have made a serious web business consisting of little more than pictures of cats with captions. IT MAKES NO SENSE. Except on the internet, it does.
Our psyche is comprised of several overlapping subcultures, really. We know this. We have our class identification, our race, our religion, and several others. Our hobbies. Our passions. Our obscure interests. Those forums we frequent. We market based on class, we market based on race. We often think of the Barbarian Group through this prism as a multicultural marketing agency for Internet Culture. The Subservient Chicken was a perfect example of this. It was marketing to a segment of BK’s consumers – the ones who get the munchies, let’s say.
This has interesting ramifications against brands and branding. Branding has always been about speaking to everyone in the same voice. We often reject this at The Barbarian Group. Benjamin often points out that he speaks to his mother differently than he speaks to a client, and he may speak to two friends differently and that this is all totally right and good. it is counterintuitive – though obviously less effort – to speak to everyone in one voice. We recognize this in multicultural marketing, and it should be recognized with the internet culture. As an aside, the internet culture is generally a high-value audience: young, educated and upwardly mobile. In searching to be respectful and understanding of our customers, we almost have a duty to speak their language. And if that means we need to shoot beer out of a cannon for no good or apparent reason, well, that’s not such a terrible thing, is it?

1 http://www.metacafe.com/watch/1157418/i_can_has_cheezburger_founder_and_ceo/

Here are some recent posts from our employees about Internet Culture:

The Buzzkillers

An odd thing happened last week: A large technology company (nearly universally known and widely respected and loved) released a new social networking aggregator, free, to users of its (also free, and widely used) email service.
That they did this is not the odd part.
That users and the “blogosphere” at large reacted swiftly and overwhelmingly in the negative isn’t even the odd part.
The odd part, the thing that made me take pause, was how familiar this reaction has become.
Think about it: in the past 2 years, how many times have we seen this? How many new product launches have been met with this type of derision, this collective “meh”? Google Buzz, the iPad, President Obama. All have felt the swift sea change from media darlings to pariahs. The Facebook Redesign Backlash has become as reliable as Death and Taxes. But why?
I asked some folks on Twitter their opinions, to varied response. One user, @majormoore, chimed in with the succinct “uhh because the products don’t live up to the hype.” And maybe that is true. But whose fault is that? Who created that hype to begin with?
The answer is us. We did. Increasingly, we build hype and then complain when the product fails to live up to our own inflated expectations.
The Internet and society at large has undergone this subtle shift, this increasing fragmentation. When we started this whole thing, message boards were filled with passionate, niche fanboys, and each small community had its own critics, and its own defenders. The rise of blogs gave a more public voice to the user, letting them curate a voice and identity that could have shades of grey.
But with the advent of microblogging on Twitter and Facebook alike, the pieces of the collective attention pie are growing exponentially thin. The combination of a steadily growing online user base along with a far more public and homogenized forum means that we react not with many voices, but a chorus. And increasingly it’s a chorus of boos.
Why? Because as someone once noted, everyone’s a critic, especially on the Internet. Our culture has steadily moved towards one of critical thought; a culture where every experience, whether it be culinary, cinematic, or emotional, needs to be analyzed, ranked and rated. 5 stars. Two thumbs up. Hot or not. And the easiest way to be a critic is to be negative, to come up with some complaint about why you dislike something, to point out a flaw, is the easiest most base form of critical thinking. Folks think that by coming out and saying “the iPad is just a big iPhone with a shitty name!” they are somehow defining their personal online brand as a Technological Analyst. They are trying, in vain, to rise above the crowd by shouting the same message.
This is troubling because, increasingly, our opinions and reactions are directly tied to the financial success of the companies we both love and deride. Say what you want about Apple’s secrecy– imagine the technological landscape without them. Imagine the mobile OS landscape without the iPhone. But with every new product launch, those achievements are quickly forgotten. We set the bar higher, and then are shocked when they fail.
Hopefully this is an adolescent trend in the puberty of the Internet. Hopefully we’re in that obnoxious “I know everything and I will tell you whether you like it or not” phase. Hopefully we’ll grow up, get laid, and start listening to better music (metaphorically speaking). Because right now, all this negativity is making the Internet a drag.
(Twitter user @deanjanssen pointed me to this great post, which says what I just did, but far more entertainingly: here)
(Also, comedian Louis CK’s Everything’s Amazing and Nobody’s Happy is also about this, but WAY funnier)

Farmville - A Community of Farmers or a Cult?

My sister is a highly educated professor living in Amman, Jordan. She is currently preparing to defend her doctoral thesis this coming summer. So it was only natural that I became very worried when her conversations switched from focusing on politics to farming. That’s right, farming.
Today I am announcing that I will be taking a four week leave of absence in order to go to Farmville in search of my sister. I fear that this farming phenomenon is actually a cult and hope to rescue my sister before she gets in too deep. During my four weeks I will be posting investigative reports in order to educate others about the dangers of Farmville.
This mission does not come without risks and that is why I have enlisted friends on the outside to monitor my whereabouts. Should it appear that I have also become brainwashed by the people of Farmville, they have strict instructions to come in rescue me. Friends and fellow Barbarians, I love you all and please try not to worry.
-Shelby

Today: TBG Park(ing) Day!

TBG New York is out working from the streets RIGHT NOW. We’re partaking in Park(ing) Day. Stop on by, say hi, and get yourself a free website.
We’ll be on Grand between Broadway and Mercer all day today.

All The Cool Kids Are Doing It

Public Service Announcement: I have joined the ranks of the lazybloggers. That is, I am now importing my Tumblr feed into my TBG blog, which contains the following:
As a result, my posts may be numerous, terse, nonsensical and/or random. Also, since I’m usually not using Tumblr itself to “reblog” content, items may not always properly attribute a source, but I’ll do my best to resolve that where it seems warranted. Otherwise it’s probably safe to assume that anything awesome or funny comes from Benjamin, Rick, Noah or some other Barbarian, and anything transit-related comes from Streetsblog.
Sorry in advance for the additional clutter. But hey, if you can’t beat ‘em join ‘em, right?

SVEDKA.com Bot Builder asks you to Bot Yourself

Many years from now (let’s say, 2033), the world will be a much sexier place. All of this strife and conflict and spam and Twitter outages will have been resolved, replaced by a wonderful, vodka-filled nonstop party. And SVEDKA is the uncontested president of that party. And everyone who’s anyone has given up their bodies and gone Bot.
Well, you don’t have to wait. The SVEDKA Bot Builder lets you create a perfect, silicone simulacrum of your sexy self, one that is more perfect than you could ever hope to be. Your Bot won’t age, won’t rust, and certainly won’t be hailing a cab at midnight because it has a 9 am meeting.
Building on the svelte SVEDKA.com, The Barbarian Group combined like Voltron with OddCast to create the SVEDKA Bot Builder, utilizing their way-futuristic character generation to make sure the Bots were as sexy as possible.
You can upgrade your new Bot bod with all sorts of useful tools, like rollerskate feet, wings, and an arm that’s an always-full martini. You can paint it, pose it, and even add some sick lowrider flames if you’re feeling fancy.
Once you’ve got your Bot perfected, you can make it do your bidding: say marginally titillating things with a voice-synthesized e-card, show off your shiny new physique on your Facebook profile, or save out some snapshots to use as profile pics on Twitter, AIM, or Friendster.com.
So go on! Get your Bot on – the future isn’t going to wait.

Shower Idea #001: Age Verification Quizzes

I have my best ideas in the shower (well, not always IN the shower, but you get the idea.). So this is my attempt at an ongoing collection of these ideas. All rights reserved, hit me up if you want to get rich.
Shower Idea #001: Age Verification Quizzes
Kids are dumb today, huh? They don’t even know how to search for things on the Internet, much less read or memorize. And yet, we have all of these things online that are age-restricted: porn sites, booze sites, the good redband movie trailers. So we put up these ridiculous Age Verification pages, which ask you your birthday and hope you’re honest. (It’s amazing how many people were born in January of a random year…)They’re a legal shield – nothing more.
So can’t we combine the two? Instead of asking someone their age, ask them a question they should KNOW at 18 or 21, like historical facts or math problems or things like that. We have all these standardized tests that say what we should know at a given time – let’s capitalize on it!
This would be awesome for websites, but would rule harder on things like Video Games, Apps, Movies – anything that has a tiered access structure. That way, kids who want to watch a PG-13 movie would have to answer 13 year old aptitude questions, where as 16+ kids would have to know, you know, what the Holocaust is. (I say this because a 16 year old once asked me what the Holocaust was.)
And hell, if they’re not 18, well at least they’re smarter, right? If they don’t know the answer, at least they’ll get better at looking it up, or answering multiple choice tests or whatever. And instead of just selecting a random birthday, maybe they’ll learn something. Call it Intellicaptcha.
But what if I’m over 18 and STILL don’t know the answer?, I hear you asking. Well, then, LOOK IT UP! Honestly, you people.

My Day at MoMA

MoMA has launched this excellent service (that’s a little bit gimmick, but 90% utility) called My Day at MoMA.
Essentially, the site asks you when you plan to visit, and then scans your Facebook profile to determine what the best day to visit would be, and creates an editable itinerary.
Having worked on another major Art Museum site, this addresses a very real and major aspect of what a Museum’s site should do – prepare the person for their visit, and get them excited about it. That might seem obvious, but you would be amazed at just how many Museum sites fail at this.
It’s a nice execution using existing social networks to provide a jumping off point, if not a solution.
Now if they could work on improving modern art.

Eugene Mirman discusses Advertising in the year 2009.

Really, required viewing.